Problem of Proliferation :: essays research papers

The Problem of ProliferationThere is a controversy as to the meaning of proliferation. Proliferation is the process of deadly weapons being bought and sold in the market place of corruption and greed. Government leaders are playing a deadly game by implementing creation of foreign policies that are trim to obtain goals, yet sponsor actions that contradict those goals. The chapter argues that we must be fitted to evaluate the facts and separate them from our emotions concerning the situation. The Problem of Defining ProliferationHenry Sokolski stated in 1993 that even the intelligence community has not been able to define the terminus proliferation adequately. The military, intelligence agencies, terrorist organizations and diplomats will all define the term diametricly because of their different perspectives. Although there is controversy in the exact meaning, I feel that the raw material meaning is evident, which is nations who do not possess the deadly weapons of mass dying attempt to obtain them by illegal methods. The Threat of nuclear ProliferationNuclear proliferation is the most feared form of proliferation, while terrorism is the most feared force that is suspect of having the ideological motivation ant the ways that the knowledge and resources are obtained to baffle it a real threat. A non-proliferation treaty was signed by a group of nations whom called themselves the Nuclear Club. This group considers themselves as being the arbitrators of the instruction of nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. There are states who argue this manifestation that they have the right to possess the weapons for their security. Scott Sagan argues this idea fearing that it may cause a chain reaction with other nations obtaining and even making their own nuclear weapons. Proof of this theory was made clear when explosions occurred during testing of weapons by Pakistan and India in May of 1998. The contradictions have been made evident and public in some(prenominal ) articles and reports. In in 1995 the unite States Department of Strategic Command suggested that the U.S. should give, as part of its persona that it will become irrational and unforgiving if its vital interest are attacted. USA Today, in 1997 contained ii articles in the same paper that contradicted each other. One of the articles stated that Chinese Military is developing high-tech weapons to win a war against the United States and the other was the US may sell nuclear technology to China. In 1998 Joseph Douglas Jr.