The Vulnerability of Man Essay example -- essays research papers

The Vulnerability of ManNature dwarfs us. The jungle absorbs us. Struggling to survive in the middle of an tantalising jungle, one truly ch entirelyenges his own dominances to the temptation of the jungle of the inconsistency of an abyss which lies so closely beneath us. All of our days and ways are a fragile structure balanced agitatedly atop the hungry jaws of nature that get out effortless devour us. A happy life is a daily amnesty from this knowledge. Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness and Francis Ford Coppolas Apocalypse Now share a common theme where the feeble human cannot restrain the domination of the jungle. Those who live in a fools paradise pass on give off in a fools paradise, and those who discover the horrors of life will die in the jungle. Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now and Captain Kurtz in Heart of Darkness acquire two been lured into a God-like life in the jungle. Willard and Marlow both travel a long way down a river to attempt to rescue Kurtz, or kill h im. The Kurtz in both stories have lost restraint to the wilderness, while Willard and Marlow fight hard to keep theirs. The opening scene in the movie captures a distraught Willard having just returned from the Vietnam War. Willard is pouncing around in his hotel room as though a savage. Only later it is revealed that he is resisting the temptation of returning to the jungle. When I was here, I wanted to be there when I was there all I could think about was getting back in the jungle (Captain Willard). This scene suggests Willards strength to resist temptation. Having already escaped from Vietnam once, he will do it again. The matter is however, the difficulty of withstanding the jungle is like pulling two burly magnets in opposite directions. Willard himself deals with a desire to escape into the jungle. He is timid of his reasons, but his physicality and mentality demands it. In Apocalypse Now, the Vietnam War only plays a surface role, a parallel for the jungle, in which both d isplay the personal effects of corruption and destruction on man. The true significance of the story lays beneath the surface, as the horror of existence, the horror of strength, and the horror of an ability to kill without feeling.In the scratch of the novel, Marlow and four other Englishmen are stranded close to the mouth of the Thames Riv... ...ad put his restraint to test eventually swallowed him whole. As does in Apocalypse Now, both Kurtz die saying The horror. The horror. While the definition of this horror is clearly defined in Apocalypse Now, it is left unclear in The Heart of Darkness. These words might have no larger meaning at all. Though there is a constituent of madness to Kurtz, hes remained coherent enough for the audience to wonder whether in form off all restraints in the jungle, he has discovered some dark truth about the world, a truth that horrifies him. His words might be a pronouncement on the universe we all inhabit, as in Apocalypse Now, Colonel Kurtzs di scovery of how fragile men live their lives is easily tempted by the wilderness, and nearly will fall into this trap. In the Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now, the stories contain symbolic imagery of the all-too-powerful nature against the defenseless man. Both stories contain a horror of which one has been given a definition, and the other left for the audience to define. The stories examine a mans capacity for evil and madness, and the level of self-control inevitable to survive the manipulation of nature.