Problems of Water Supply in the Rural Communities of Nigeria

Problems of pee hang on in the Rural Communities of NigeriaProblems of piddle Supply in the Rural Communities of Delta submit, NigeriaAbstractThis study assess the caper of verdant urine bring outing in Delta slate with the main quarry of examining the factors responsible for the incidence of ineffective body of urine append to the rural communities of Delta state, Nigeria. Questionnaire inspect was the instrument of entropy generation and a total of 500 questionnaires were administered to 10 rural communities of the state. The data were analyzed with descriptive and multiple regression analyses and the sideline constitutes as the observations as follows erratic situation supply, embezzlement of fund, diversion of hydraulic equipment, theft, government activity policy, undiscriminating wast long time/cargonlessness, poor maintenance culture, fruity hydraulic equipment and dismission by evaporation.IntroductionStudies on piss resources have concentrated on urban setting to the detriment of rural communities (Adesuyi, 1996 Adebola, 2001 Ovrawah and Hy much, 2001 and Efe, 2003). For instance, on that point is absolute absence seizure of wet schemes in intimately rural communities of Delta state e.g. Otorho-Abraka, Samagidi/Kokori, Abbi, Anwai etc., even when they exist, they argon non-functioning. Thus, most women and school children balanced basin, buckets, 20-50litres Geri cans on their head and trek vast spaces to streams, rivers, wells and bore holes. The varied body of wet sources result in consumers outlay many hours waiting for water or carrying water to their homes. For example, in Anwai the agree in getting water from private bores is detrimental to the study regime of students of the Delta State University, Anwal Campus.The inadequate water supply has resulted in water borne illness largely beca intake of the supply misappropriation of fund, diversion of water scheme, erratic author supply amongst former(a) (Efe, 2003). This problem becomes more stabbing in new clocks as a result of increased nation. Thus, this work assay to investigatethe factors militating against effective water supply,study the cost of all(prenominal) water supply scheme,study era spent on obtaining water on daily as a social cost andstudy solvent to ameliorate the problems.Study AreaDelta state lies between eagle-eyeditude 5E and 645E and latitudes 5N and 630N and has land mass areas of 16,842km Square. Delta state lies within the Benin, Agbada and Akata formation in terms of geology (see fig.1). The state is run out by river Niger, and its distributaries (Forcados, Escravos and Warn river and creeks), Jamieson and Ethiope (www.on1ine.nigeria.com 2312/05). River Niger drains the eastern flank of the state and empty it water into the sea. Delta state has a population of about 2,590 491, where about 75% of her population lives in rural areas (1991 census), without in force(p) access to potable water. The state is sha red out into three seaatorial territorys Delta North, 793,517 Delta central with a population 936,707 and Delta South, 865,540 population (Omaksone, 2004).MethodologyThis work-utilised data generated through direct fieldwork exercises. The instrument of data generation is the questionnaire administration. The questionnaire was administered through domineering sampling technique. On the whole, a total of 50 questionnaires were administered to eh community, making a total of 500 respondents that were interviewed. The data were analysed with the aid of multiple regression compendium and descriptive statistics.Data Analysis and Discussion of ResultsSource of piss SupplyDifferent types of water supply sources exdist in the study for effective workout of the respondents as follows (See table 1)mesa 1 Sources of rural water supply in Delta StateSource Authors fieldwork, 2005.Table I indicates that 39% of the rural inhabitants of these communities obtain their drinking water from Rain wet Harvesting, 24% from river or stream who carried the water through long blank spaces, 14% from Wells, 13% from private boreholes who make a charge to househ previous(a)s on the water supplied, 9% from Tankers which supply water to homes from long distances, and 1% from state possess boreholes who provide free water services to the households. Most of the water sources are owned and keep by private aboutbodys. For instance out of the 72 boreholes in table 1, it is only 3 that are owned and maintained by State Government. These bores are found in Patani, Ozoro, Anwai. This represents only 4% of the boreholes in these communities. The State owned boreholes are very irregular in their water supply.Essentially, there are timesQuantity, Distance, Time and Cost of water systemTable 2 show the volume of water supply to each household, distance and time spent in obtaining water from the various sources. On daily basis, an average of 80 litres of Rain Water are harvested whenever it rains. This record the highest volumes of water obtained by each household. About 30minutes are spent on the average whenever it rains by each household fetching water.Table 3 Average time and daily demand of water per householdIt is recuperate from table 3 that Well Water recorded 35 litres of water obtained by each household at a time and distance of 1hours 30minutes and 1km respectively. The volume of well water obtained by each household is attributed to the long distance and time spent, hence reduction in the quantity of supplied. tally the inhabitants because they cannot afford the price of Borehole water, we resort to trekking distance places and spending long time as well carrying water from Wells and Streams the various houses. Similarly, the long time and distance spent in obtaining water from streams reduces the quantity of stream water supply. This show an average of 30litres of stream water supply at a time and distance of 2hours and 1 V2 km respectively spent in obt aining stream or river water by each household. Thus, the higher the distance and time spent in obtaining water from these sources reduces the volumes of water demanded by each household (See fig, 2). For instance it is clear from these communities (Otorho, Ozoro, Ekpan-Ovu, Kokoro and Patani) in fig.2 that as the time expended in obtaining domestic water increases, the quantity of water demanded by the inhabitants of these communities decreases. Though the water from these sources is free, but there is economic cost to the water as children, women and students in most of these communities spend a considerable time carrying water to pucker their need, which time they could have expended in earning income.Fig. 2 Domestic water spending and time required for well water and stream water stack away at Otorho-Abraka, Kokori Ekpan-Ovu, Ozoro and PataniSimilarly, it also reduces the time they could have expended in household ram amongst other activities. However, the cost of water from boreholes and tankers led to the reduction in volumes of water obtained from boreholes and water tankers.Factors of Ineffective Water SupplyThe respondents generally agreed that in all the rural communities they experienced acute problem of water supply. Essentially, they notice that the factors that are responsible for the problem of water supply relates to erratic causality supply, embezzlement of fund/corruption, diversion of hydraulic equipment/political factors, theft, government policy, indiscriminate wastage/carelessness, poor maintenance culture, faulty distribution system and topography of the areas (See table 4).Table 4 Correlation co-efficient between acute problem of water supply and the associated factors responsible.Source Authors Fieldwork, 2005The results of the correlativity statistics shows that the problem of inadequate water supply to the rural communities of Delta State, rely heavily on the predictive factors The individual explanatory contributions of each of this predictive model are discussed below.Erratic power is the highest explanatory factor of inadequate water supply. This is evident from a confirmatory correlativity coefficient of 0.48 (see table 4). This is significant at 0.05 confidence level, This shows a confident(p) contribution, and as such the problem of water supply became worsen with increase epileptic power supply to these communities. For instance most of these communities resort to the use of self-generating plant to pump the water through self-help attacks. But as a result of hike in prices of petroleum products, the generating plant was abandoned, hence acute shortage of water supply to these communities. The second contributory is embezzlement of fund, which shows a correlation coefficient of 0.39, thus water problems became more acute as more funds meant for water projects are embezzled. For examples there are series of complains by the rural inhabitants that huge amount of money has been released for the s itting of water projects by the successive government. But such projects are either not undertaken repayable to embezzlement of fund or they are poorly executed. As such, most of the hydraulic projects packed up soon later on commissioning.The third predicative factors affecting acute supply of water in the rural communities of Delta State is the diversion of hydraulic project or political factor. This indicates a collateral correlation coefficient of 0.35. For instance, water projects meant for Otorho Abraka, Abavo, Samagidi etc has been diverted to personal compound or to other villages because these communities did not vote for them during the last political dispensation. Theft of hydraulic equipment is the fourth part predictive factor of water supply with positive correlation coefficient of 0.33. This indicates that as more hydraulic equipment are stolen or vandalized, the problem of water supply to the area will become more acute For instance the generating plants and sub mersible pump at Emevo, Otorho Abraka, have been vandalized. Thus, the acute problems of water supply in these in these rural communities of Delta State. Another causal factor is the lack of applaudable government policy of water supply for all (both rural and urban areas of the state). This factor shows weak positive effects of 0.22 correlation coefficient. The state, local government and ministry of water resources in Delta state, have not made concerted effort to actualise this policy, to them they are constraints with the problem of finance and high price of hydraulic equipments.Another identified factor of inadequate water supply is indiscriminate wastage arid careless use of water. This indicates correlation coefficient values of 0.12. In some of the rural communities (Patani, Ozoro, and Anwai) where there is existence of public tap, it is not uncommon to find children and some adults, attempting to drink direct from household and public taps without exploitation a containe r. At times, the children forget to lock the tap back after usage. In this way, they waste the greater portion of the water, and the wasted water is depended on pressure of the area. This view collaborated the work of Oyabande (1981) in the city of Jos. Lack of good maintenance culture is another causal factor in the areas where there is public water supply. It shows weak correlation coefficient of 0.04. For instance, most of the equipments are old and absolute and some of the pipes are corroded, without replacement. As such, there is frequent disruption of the equipment. Similar to this factor, is faulty hydraulic and distributing system. Due to corrosion and old age of the pipe lines there are many leakages from these pipelines and finihy fitting in tank. This indicated an rearward effect on effective water supply. This is evident from a correlation coefficient of 0.35.The topography of the area recorded the list amongst the predictive factors ofwater problem. This shows an inve rse correlation coefficient of 0.50. This factor is most severe in Delta north senatorial district (Anwal, Uineunede and Abavo) communities. For examples at Anwai it takes up 200 250 feet depth before the aquifer can be stroke, at Abavo and Umuenede it takes 180 210 feet depending on the location, such, sitting of water project in these areas is relatively very difficult.ConclusionCertainly the health, amenity and standard of alive of the inhabitants of these communities are dependant upon the provision of acceptable system of water supplies to these rural communities. Its regular supply enhanced liveability and longevity of Life in this environmental setting. To enhance regular supply of water to the rural inhabitants of Delta state there is urgent need to adopt the above policy measures.ReferencesAdebola, K.D. (2001) Groundwater feature in Ilorin Township An Environmental Review. African journal of Environmental Studies 2(2) Pp. 4-7.Adesuyi, O. (1996) Nigeria Produces 25 cour se of study water Masterplan. Ultimate water Technology and Environment 1(1) l7-ISpp.Efe, S.I. (2003) Water Quality and its Utilisation in the Nigerian Rural Setting of Abraka Delta State, Nigeria. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Dynamics. Maiden (ed) pp. 81 86Ovrawah, L. and Hymore, F.K. (2001) Quality of Water from hand-dug wells in the Warn Environs of Niger Delta Region 2(2)pp. 169-173Oyebande, L. (1981) The Hydrology of Urban Water Supply A Case of Jos. P.O. Sada and J.S. Oguntoymbo (eds) in Urbanisation Processes and Problems in Nigeria. Ibadan. University muddle pp.141 149.1